top of page
Search

Australian Doctors are Complicit in Experimentation on the Population

Updated: Oct 18, 2021


It is the ‘education’ and regulation of doctors that is preventing doctors from practicing medicine with integrity in 2020-21. The Information provided by the Therapeutic Goods Administrator (TGA), that is summarised in our legal letter to decline this injection, states that COVID-19 vaccines are:

  1. Experimental and include new untested genetic technology. Hence these drugs only have provisional approval and are not full approved for use in humans.

  2. The vaccines are not safe. Millions of injuries have been recorded by global government regulators including – anaphylaxis, thrombosis, and coagulation disorders (blood clots), infertility, heart problems (myocarditis and pericarditis), neurological damage (cognitive decline), strokes, paralysis, convulsions, seizures and well over 100,000 deaths.

  3. There are on average more deaths per day to the COVID vaccines than to COVID-19 disease itself.

  4. The vaccines are ineffective – they do not prevent you getting or dying from COVID-19 disease, and they do not prevent transmission of the virus in the community. Hence, they are a drug and not a ‘vaccine’ under the WHO’s definition of a vaccine.

  5. They have only been tested to see if they reduce the symptoms and not to see if they prevent disease.

  6. They are unnecessary because 99.9% of people under 70 develop immunity through mild or asymptomatic infection. Our immune system develops natural herd immunity in the community through this exposure and the most detrimental action that any government can take is to quarantine healthy asymptomatic people. This hinders the control of infectious diseases in the community. Hence, Sweden did not lockdown its population and the WHO did not provide any evidence that asymptomatic people were a risk to the community in March 2020 when they used this strategy for the first time in history.

  7. The injection is not specific for COVID-19 disease and the synthetic spike protein that is produced by our cells upon exposure to any coronavirus is toxic to the human body. This includes the development of autoimmune diseases, blood clots and infertility.

Did you see this information reported in the mainstream media? No. Welcome to 2021 where the medical-industry uses framed and manipulated statistics, emotional labels, and anecdotal evidence in the mainstream media to inform you about any drug that they have labelled a ‘vaccine.’


The removal of both scientific evidence and balanced discussion of vaccines in the media has occurred over decades, and we now have a situation where labels and biased information are being used to manipulate your thinking about these drugs. Drugs that are being mandated for HEALTHY people in genetically diverse populations.


This fraudulent promotion of a medical intervention was cemented in 2009 when a government board was set up in Australia to regulate doctors on the “accepted” science for vaccine promotion.


This Federal government agency is called the Australian Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority (AHPRA) and it is both a government agency and an Australian incorporated business (ABN 78 685 433 429).


In other words, this board controls the knowledge doctors can promote on vaccines and it influences the design and promotion of government vaccination policies. This board has the power to de-regulate doctors and health professionals who make a different risk assessment of vaccines to that provided by this government regulatory board.


Medication for healthy people affects their quality of life and it is doctors who are trained to assess the medical literature for risks and benefits. The AHPRA board has a serious conflict of interest in the regulation of doctors’ knowledge on vaccines, and doctors cannot speak the truth to power if they can lose their livelihoods for doing so.


The risks of vaccines associated with our genetics are now being described as "antivaccination material" and doctors are threatened with de-registration by AHPRA for providing this medical literature to their patients. This includes contraindications to vaccines that have been practiced for 40+ years but have now been arbitrarily removed.


Hence, doctors are now violating the first principle of medicine because they cannot promote their patients best interest first. That is, drugs/vaccines must be given to individuals with advice regarding their own individual circumstances and genetics. This is a key factor in health outcomes with respect to drugs and when this is violated doctors are no longer promoting health in the community. They are promoting sickness and death because many illnesses are linked to our family history and genetics.


The Australian government has now indemnified doctors to give these experimental injections to their patients - injections that are documented to cause serious known and unknown harm in patients. Taxpayers (we) will be paying for our doctors to inflict this harm (and death) on patients without fully informed consent due to government mandates that remove our jobs and right to travel if we refuse.


Over the last few decades doctors have been “educated” in pharma-funded medical schools with industry-funded science. They are taught that anyone who discusses the ingredients of vaccines (drugs) or the serious risks of vaccines, is an “antivaxxer” and a “conspiracy theorist”. This same opinion is provided to the public in the corporate-sponsored mainstream media to denigrate any scientific discussion of the risks of these drugs that are given to healthy people.


Mainstream media has always been a tool to manipulate public behaviour and when the US Congress removed liability from pharmaceutical companies for any harm caused by any drug labelled a “vaccine” in 1986 (because they were paying millions of dollars in compensation for deaths and injuries), this enabled big pharma to minimise the risks of these drugs and to exaggerate the benefits (“life-saving products”) – without providing evidence for these claims.


In 2021 this dismissive ridicule by authorities reached a new low when the Western Australian Premier, Mark McGowan, disrespectfully told ~5,000 WA parents and grandparents at a rally opposing mandatory jabs for jobs, to Grow a brain and he stated that “this is about medicine and saving lives”. This statement by this Premier is simply untrue when you ignore the genetics of the population.


High school science students can tell the Premier that a mandatory drug/vaccine, in a genetically diverse population, will cause death and sickness in a significant proportion of the population. Mark McGowan should be removed from his role as Premier for his contempt for the people he serves and for putting the public's lives are risk with false health information.


Politicians, media, and doctors are using labels to convey a ‘belief’ about vaccines and to stigmatise critical thinking, and this is done without providing any supportive evidence for the implied meanings the words are given. This strategy has been used to support the expansion of national vaccination programs from 1986 – 2021.


Since 1986 ‘beliefs’ that are not evidence-based have been promoted by the media, politicians and doctors by using the following words to promote public health policy:


Vaccines - drugs that have ‘rare’ side-effects and are ‘necessary to control infectious diseases.’ Both claims are untrue.


Infectious diseases – re-labelled as ‘vaccine-preventable diseases’ since 1986 to imply that they can be prevented with a vaccine.


Vaccination programs – falsely labelled as ‘immunisation programs.’ It is known that many vaccinated people do not get immunity after a vaccine is given and they still get the disease.


Catch-Up Schedules – They are not catch-up schedules because most older Australians did not have these vaccines and were never at risk from these diseases.


Antivaxxer – a derogatory term used to describe an educated parent/professional that discusses the risk-benefit analysis of vaccines or ingredients of vaccines. Knowledge of these criteria are necessary to promote ‘healthy’ outcomes from vaccines, yet they are ridiculed.


Conspiracy Theory – derogatory term used to dismiss the serious conflicts of interest in every aspect of global health policy designed by the WHO/GAVI alliance and national vaccination policies designed by governments.


This is a political situation, and it is the influence of corporate money in the political and economic decisions of governments that has led to doctors, governments and the media collaborating to commit a serious crime against their populations by falsely advertising an experimental genetic technology as a ‘vaccine’.


People, including health professionals, are walking into their own deaths and illnesses, due to the false and misleading health information that is being provided by the powerful medical-industry complex to politicians.


This corporate health model has monopolised doctors, industry-funded research institutions, politicians, and the mainstream media to educate the public with ignorance about the risks of vaccines. A situation described as agnotology in the academic literature and if doctors were not gagged by AHPRA (their government/corporate regulatory board) it would not have been possible to violate their medical ethics and commit this crime against humanity that will destroy the genetic fabric of society.

3,103 views12 comments

Recent Posts

See All

12 Comments


Thank you Judy I take heart that eventually the truth will come out

Like

Great post thank you, Judy,

I think one of the problems we have in getting others to read this important information, we try to encourage people to just look at the evidence but they are so indoctrinated, by all the MSM and the trash from goverment that they won't even listen. I was recently told that the unvaxxed the reason no one can travel, I said you have to look at the governments not the un vaccinated.

Like
Replying to

It is a topsy turvy world indeed. Speaking for myself, I never used to really CONSIDER people's views if they did not align with mine, I just parroted what I had been taught (or brainwashed to believe) in order to convert them to my side.


The art of LISTENING is a skill we have lost (I am working hard on this one) and IMO that is where the divide lies. Empathy and understanding require time and energy, once prevalent at the family dinner table or whilst sitting on a neighbours porch.


As Judy said removal of honest and open discussion has led to manipulation of the public and false advertising causes many to shut their ears to the difficult truth.


Like

Thank you Judy for speaking out for us, I admire your courage and the information provided is excellent

Like

My GP called me selfish when I told him I didn't want to be experimented on with the vaccine and then told me I was being scammed when I mentioned the use of aborted fetal tissue being used in his Pfizer vaccines and that was completely false information.

Like
Replying to

....anyone who wants to take the "vaccine" is free to do so far as I am concerned. While I believe they have been misinformed, if that is their choice, so be it. The same freedom of choice must apply to any who decline.


Also far as I am concerned, anyone forcing, pressuring or coercing someone else to get the "vaccine" is a collaborator with a fascist totalitarian regime. Depending on the position they hold it could also amount to treason or sedition against the Australian people.

Like

Could you please give some of your sources of information for this article? Particularly, points 3 and 4? I would like to share this information with friends and family, but would need some statistical or scientific back up.

Like
Replying to

Thank you for your feedback Helen, we take on board your point however as we suggest the research paper be provided to employers along with the declination letter, we feel it best to keep them in the same place. We also have a tab in the forum for these letters.

Like
bottom of page