top of page
Search

Connecting the Dots

Updated: Jun 28, 2023

Key Points:

  • The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) delayed the release of its hospitalisation data, which revealed significant findings.

  • COVID-19 hospitalisations increased by a staggering 5500%.

  • Admitted patient care experienced a decline of 2.1%, while non-admitted patient care saw an alarming increase of 42.42%.

  • Procedural clinics witnessed an exceptional growth, with the number of service events skyrocketing from 3.13 million to 12.9 million, representing a remarkable 311.47% increase.

What Does This Mean?

  • The government response to the pandemic, guided by the World Health Organisation (WHO), included lockdown measures, which played a vital role in delaying virus transmission but exacerbated other illnesses.

  • COVID-19 cases surged after booster shots were administered to the majority of the population, indicating a failure of vaccines to halt transmission and resulting in a significant increase in hospitalisations.

  • The surge in COVID-19 cases among the vaccinated population raises questions about the impact of both lockdown measures and potentially the vaccines themselves, as these factors may have contributed to an increased vulnerability to the illness.

  • The mass vaccination campaign in Australia, along with reported adverse events, correlates with a notable rise in excess mortality from all causes.

What Can You Do?

  • As a signatory to the WHO pandemic treaty, Australia should consider opting out to avoid potential future mandates, such as mandatory vaccinations and lockdowns.

  • It is of utmost importance for the public to actively advocate for politicians to withdraw from the pandemic treaty and initiate a thorough inquiry into the significant upsurge in excess mortality, which aligns with the increasing vaccine uptake. Start by contacting your local member of parliament.


In the realm of children's puzzles, joining the dots creates a captivating image, revealing a hidden picture when all the dots are connected. Similarly, in the realm of public health, it is essential to connect the dots and explore the perplexing rise in excess deaths following the widespread administration of COVID-19 vaccines.

Connect the Dots

In November 2020, People for Safe Vaccines was born out of genuine concerns regarding the safety of rapidly developed, emergency-use-authorised vaccines entering the market. Our organisation was driven by a desire to critically examine the effectiveness of administering vaccines directly into the bloodstream to combat respiratory viruses like COVID-19.


We have fervently appealed to policy makers, urging them to consider the inherent capabilities of the body's immune system in effectively responding to the SARS-CoV-2 infection when functioning optimally. In our efforts, we highlighted concerns regarding the accuracy and reliability of diagnostic tools, questioned the risks associated with asymptomatic transmission, and voiced our apprehension about adopting the World Health Organisation (WHO)’s guidance, which encompassed lockdown measures and vaccination strategies, and their protocols for certifying COVID-19 deaths. We firmly believe that these measures have inadvertently introduced biases that favour presumptive misdiagnoses, thereby warranting a reevaluation of the existing approach.


In our comprehensive analysis, we meticulously delineated the potential risks associated with widespread COVID-19 vaccination, encompassing concerns such as autoimmune responses, stroke, paralysis, seizures, anaphylaxis, encephalitis, birth defects, severe allergic reactions, and even fatalities. The expedited nature of these experimental vaccines has resulted in a limited requirement for pre-market safety and efficacy verification. Unfortunately, our governments and their media affiliates have failed to adequately inform the public about these risks, instead advocating rushed mandatory vaccinations. Therefore, organisations like ours have shouldered the responsibility of scrutinising diverse datasets, and presented a more balanced perspective to our members, aiming to ensure informed decision-making.


On 8th February 2022, we released our inaugural report, a meticulously compiled 76-page document that provides an in-depth and fully referenced analysis of the efficacy of mass vaccination in mitigating the clinical severity of COVID-19. Using official real-world data, we rigorously examine the validity of effectiveness claims. Our report delves into various critical aspects, including an evaluation of the Doherty Modelling Report, the definitions of "pandemic" and "vaccine," the prevalence of the disease in Australia following the vaccine rollout, concerns surrounding testing methodologies, vaccine safety apprehensions, the misleading representation of clinical severity risks in the unvaccinated (due to the absence of a distinct category for individuals who have not received any dose of a COVID-19 vaccine), and the misleading use of Relative Risk Ratio instead of Absolute Risk Ratio when claiming efficacy. Furthermore, we scrutinise the declining rates of genomic sequencing, and the correlation between vaccination dosage and increased cases, hospitalisations, ICU admissions, and mortality rates across all causes. With extensive research and thorough examination, our report aimed to shed light on crucial aspects related to mass vaccination and COVID-19 outcomes, empowering individuals to make informed decisions.


Over the course of several months, we continued our diligent efforts and published an additional eight reports between 2nd March 2022 and 26th July 2022. Among these reports, the most recent one delves into a comprehensive analysis of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare's (AIHW) report titled "Australia's Health 2022: data insights." This particular report has proven to be profoundly enlightening on numerous fronts, particularly exposing how the manipulation and misinterpretation of statistics have deceived us rather than providing us with genuine knowledge and understanding. Our aim remains to unravel the truth behind the numbers and present a clearer picture to the public, fostering a more informed and discerning approach to critical health matters.


Our extensive investigation revealed a disheartening failure on the part of both the government and the medical fraternity to adhere to numerous laws and regulations, including those pertaining to informed consent. Furthermore, we uncovered the presence of government incentives that introduced biases into the decision-making process. Our analysis also highlighted compelling trends that clearly demonstrated how lockdown measures only delayed virus transmission exacerbating COVID and other illnesses. Disturbingly, we observed a notable increase in COVID-related hospitalisations, including ICU admissions and fatalities. Most shockingly, our findings indicated a concerning rise in excess deaths, highlighting the gravity of the situation. It is our responsibility to bring these critical issues to light and advocate for a more transparent and accountable approach to public health policies and interventions.


Despite the relentless efforts of ourselves and numerous other opponents of the WHO's directives, followed by our compliant government, the mandates proved to be their ultimate weapon, and regrettably, many succumbed to their influence. However, as they continuously shifted the goalposts in their reporting of COVID data, we encountered significant challenges. The manipulation of vaccination status in relation to hospitalisations was troublesome enough, but when they shifted reporting COVID numbers from daily to a weekly rolling average, it became evident that they were attempting to divert our attention.


Recognising these tactics, we made the decision to shift our focus towards relying more heavily on the official datasets provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and AIHW. It is worth noting that these datasets suffer from a delay in their release, meaning that we must exercise patience as we await their availability. Nonetheless, we remain committed to pursuing the truth and leveraging the most reliable sources of information to continue our mission.


We found ourselves in a state of anticipation as we have been waiting for eleven long months for the AIHW to release its latest data on hospitalisations. Typically, this annual report is made available in December; however, this publication was considerably delayed. The hospital data on admitted patient care that has been released so far initially surprised us, as it indicates a 2.1% reduction in hospitalisations during the last financial year. This finding is unexpected, especially when considering the daily COVID numbers that consistently depicted a significant number of hospitalisations. The discrepancy between these two sets of data has raised eyebrows and prompted further questions. However, the average length of stay for overnight hospitalisations in public hospitals increased by 7.1%, while in private hospitals it increased by 1.4%. The report also contains information on the number of hospitalisations involving a COVID-19 diagnosis, showing a significant increase from 4,700 in 2020–21 to 263,400 in 2021–22.


The question arises: How can COVID-19 hospitalisations increase by 5500% and overall hospitalisations reduce by 2.1%?

Were the daily COVID hospitalisation numbers primarily presented as a fear-inducing ploy, strategically planted to compel more individuals into accepting lockdown measures and vaccinations? Alternatively, how can we account for the decrease in overall hospitalisations despite the prevailing narrative? These perplexing circumstances lead us to scrutinise the actions of NSW Health, particularly regarding the COVID surveillance reports and the questionable labeling of vaccination status. It becomes increasingly tempting to conclude that these figures have been intentionally misleading, employing a sleight of hand approach to manipulate public perception.


Let's delve into the intriguing findings. While AIHW reports a 2.1% decrease in admitted patient care, the real revelation lies in the remarkable 42.42% increase in non-admitted patient care services, surging from 38.9 million to 55.4 million total service events. Additionally, the number of service events provided by Procedural clinics experienced exceptional growth, skyrocketing from 3.13 million to 12.9 million, representing an astounding 311.47% increase. These figures unveil a much more nuanced situation than AIHW's focus on reduced hospitalisations, which suggests vaccine effectiveness in reducing severity. However, the truth is that the surge in demand for health services has led to a shift towards outpatient care in non-admitted patient clinics. So, a patient attending an Emergency Department that gets treatment but doesn’t get admitted are included in this increase in non-admitted patient care.


It is important to note that eligibility for the Australian government's vaccine injury compensation scheme required a hospital stay. Unfortunately, the government and the medical fraternity seemed to employ tactics that obscured the true extent of vaccine injuries, potentially misleading the public into believing that their stringent measures were effective. However, the significant 42.42% increase in non-admitted patient care serves as yet another example of their attempts to conceal the truth. This unforeseen development surpasses our initial expectations and serves as a significant indictment of both the medical and political sectors for their mismanagement of health in Australia.


As we consider the possibility that the AIHW data on hospitals is compiled with greater care and accuracy, similar to what we have come to expect from the ABS all-cause mortality data, several pertinent questions arise:

  1. Is there a possible correlation between the decrease in hospital admissions and the increase in mortality? In other words, are more individuals tragically succumbing to COVID or vaccine-related injuries before they can access hospital care, or are instances of vaccine injuries being overlooked, leading to untreated cases and subsequent discharge? Our overwhelmed Emergency Services provide us with a clue here.

  2. With COVID hospitalisations, are these patients primarily individuals who sought medical attention for reasons other than COVID but tested positive for the virus while in the hospital?

  3. How many cases of vaccine injuries have been dismissed or misdiagnosed as mental health issues, potentially leading to patients being gaslighted by hospital staff?

  4. Were the reported daily COVID hospitalisations false or misleading, thus calling into question the accuracy and transparency of the information presented?

Adding to the growing sense of suspicion, it is worth noting that the ABS has been prolonging the release of their Provisional Mortality Statistics. In a rather perplexing move, their most recent report deviates from the standard practice of baseline comparisons by omitting data from the pivotal years of 2020 and 2022. Their reason? In their opinion 2020 and 2022 are “ not considered to be (a) typical year(s) for mortality in Australia.” This departure from established norms raises eyebrows and invites scrutiny.


One of the most concerning aspects of persistently high excess mortality year after year is the indication that there are underlying issues or systemic challenges that have not been adequately addressed. Excess mortality refers to the number of deaths above what would be expected based on historical data or established trends. When this indicator remains significantly elevated over an extended period, it raises red flags and warrants closer examination.


The sustained high levels of excess mortality point to potential gaps in healthcare systems, public health strategies, or societal factors that contribute to increased mortality rates. It suggests that there may be ongoing challenges in effectively managing and mitigating health risks, resulting in a continued loss of lives beyond what would be considered normal or expected.


Addressing persistently high excess mortality requires a multi-faceted approach that involves collaboration among healthcare professionals, policymakers, researchers, and communities. It calls for a commitment to identifying and rectifying the factors contributing to the excess deaths, with the ultimate goal of improving population health outcomes and reducing preventable loss of life.


However, rather than acknowledging and addressing the critical issues of excess deaths, vaccine injuries, and deaths, we find that governments, along with their data collection bureaus and the media, seem determined to bury any information that reveals the flaws in their drastic public health measures. It appears that they are actively attempting to divert attention away from the undeniable link between COVID lockdowns, fast-tracked vaccines, and the alarming rise in hospitalisation and excess deaths.


Let us not be deterred by attempts to bury the truth, but instead be motivated to uncover it. Through open dialogue, factual analysis, and unwavering determination, we can navigate these challenging times and strive for a future where the well-being and rights of every individual are respected and safeguarded.


It is imperative that we, as informed citizens, resist such attempts to obfuscate the truth. We must demand open dialogue, unbiased reporting, and a thorough examination of all available evidence. By connecting the dots between COVID lockdowns, fast-tracked vaccines, overwhelmed medical services and the concerning increase in excess deaths, we can begin to shed light on the potential consequences of these measures and hold those responsible accountable for their actions.


To prevent the repetition of the flawed COVID pandemic response, it is incumbent upon all of us to remain steadfast in sharing the truth and exerting pressure on policymakers. Specifically, we must closely scrutinise Australia's adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty, which is currently undergoing updates that grant the WHO greater powers, compromising our national sovereignty.


It is of utmost importance to acknowledge that signatory countries to this treaty, like Australia, face a critical decision: they must actively opt-out or risk being subjected to the demands of the WHO. Surrendering control of our nation to a non-elected global organisation swayed by the interests of pharmaceutical giants is an untenable prospect, and we cannot afford to remain passive in the face of such a situation.


By choosing to do nothing, we inadvertently play into the hands of those who seek to exert unwarranted influence over our country. The consequences of inaction would mean sacrificing our autonomy and allowing external forces to dictate our policies and decisions. We must rise above complacency and take a stand to protect our national sovereignty and the well-being of our citizens.


It is incumbent upon us to actively resist this encroachment on our rights and freedoms. Through informed engagement, grassroots mobilisation, and collective action, we can assert our independence and safeguard the democratic principles that define our nation. Let us not falter in our resolve to preserve our autonomy and ensure that the voice of the people remains the guiding force in shaping our future.


By staying informed, engaging in open dialogue, and actively participating in shaping our collective future, we can safeguard the principles and values that underpin a just and free society. Let us unite in our commitment to upholding truth, demanding transparency, and preserving the democratic ideals upon which our nation was founded. Together, we have the strength to ensure a future where the well-being and rights of every individual are upheld, and where decisions are made in the best interest of the people, not external forces.


In light of the current state of the nation, with medical and emergency services overwhelmed, food shortages, skyrocketing living costs, and a housing crisis persisting as direct consequences of Australia's adherence to WHO guidelines for lockdown and vaccination, it becomes glaringly evident why there may be a strong inclination by governments to conceal these harsh realities. Additionally, our suspicion is further fueled by the concerning fact that there have been approximately 140,000 reported COVID vaccine adverse events, with 14 confirmed deaths from 991 reported cases in a system that notoriously underreports by up to 95%? It begs the question: Did they believe that by quietly withdrawing the AstraZeneca vaccine, which they mandated and touted as safe and effective, we wouldn't take notice, or question the “safety and efficacy” of the other vaccines still being peddled?


The astute members of People for Safe Vaccines have diligently connected the dots in unraveling the mystery behind the surge in excess deaths following widespread vaccination. It doesn't require extraordinary insight to perceive the underlying pattern; those with a discerning eye can piece together the puzzle. The resulting picture, however, is far from pleasant, and its disturbing implications were discernible long before all the dots were fully joined.


The truth often reveals itself to those who remain vigilant and willing to question prevailing narratives. It is through their critical thinking and unwavering dedication that the pieces of this intricate puzzle have been assembled. The collective efforts of individuals who possess the clarity of thought have shed light on the disturbing correlation between vaccination and the alarming increase in mortality rates.


Rather than relying solely on official proclamations or mainstream sources, these discerning individuals have been proactive in seeking alternative perspectives and examining the available evidence. Their commitment to uncovering the truth, even when it challenges prevailing narratives, has allowed them to gain invaluable insights into the complexities surrounding excess deaths in the aftermath of mass vaccination campaigns.


The picture that emerges from their careful analysis serves as a wake-up call to the wider public. It is a stark reminder that critical thinking and independent investigation are crucial in navigating complex issues that impact our health and well-being. It is a call to question the narrative and dig deeper, even when faced with discomforting truths.

The elephant in the room

The early recognition of this unsettling image, well before the completion of all the dots, demonstrates the acumen and foresight of those who refuse to be swayed by conventional wisdom. It is a testament to their commitment to uncovering the truth and their unwavering dedication to protecting the well-being of individuals and society as a whole.


As we piece together the puzzle, it is vital that we embrace open dialogue, encourage robust debate, and collectively strive for a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities at hand. Let us not shy away from the uncomfortable truths that emerge but rather face them head-on, armed with knowledge and a determination to ensure the highest level of safety, transparency, and accountability in matters of public health.


Throughout these past eleven months, alongside our relentless pursuit of truth and accountability, we have been diligently constructing our own communities. These communities provide alternative health services that cater to those who have fallen victim to vaccine injuries and have been unjustly gaslit by the medical fraternity. Our focus extends beyond physical well-being, encompassing mental health support and addressing the trauma that has been an unfortunate consequence of the response to COVID.


In parallel, we have been nurturing the growth of robust and inclusive health initiatives, fostering creativity, innovation, and resilience among our youth. These programs are designed to inspire and empower the next generation, recognising their potential as catalysts for positive change. Additionally, we have established health hubs, advocacy platforms, and food cooperatives, among other endeavors, all aimed at fostering a holistic approach to well-being and sustainability.


At the heart of these transformative efforts lies CoVision, a parallel system that embraces compassion and human connection as its guiding principles. While People for Safe Vaccines continues to navigate within the confines of the old and crumbling system of top-down control, CoVision operates on a different wavelength, actively constructing a new world from the ground up. This forward-thinking approach ensures that our initiatives are driven by the needs and aspirations of the communities we serve, creating a space where genuine progress can flourish.


As we embark on this transformative journey, we invite all like-minded individuals to join us in reshaping the landscape of healthcare and society at large. Together, we have the power to forge a brighter, more inclusive future—one where the well-being and empowerment of every individual are at the forefront. Let us build a world that celebrates nature, unity, compassion, and the unwavering pursuit of truth and justice.

1,556 views4 comments

Recent Posts

See All

4 Comments


i appreciate the tremendous effort being made by the team here, and the effort that must have gone into writing this article.


I have a request, though, and its also in the nature of a suggestion:


If you could summarize a lengthy article like this with some main/most important points that everyone needs to know and (where appropriate) add a succinct, actionable thing you want your readers to do (Watch out for XYZ/sign this petition/call your local MP/whatever) ... then you might have more impact or at least leave your reader feeling more like they can DO something, and less like they just got swamped in facts they cant act on


again: kudos for your work and thank you

Like
Sandy Barrett
Sandy Barrett
Jun 28, 2023
Replying to

Kate, thanks for your message. I have updated the article accordingly.

Like

Follow Make Australia Healthy Again.

The truth is out there.

Like

Excellent article.

Like
bottom of page