top of page

First Supplementary Report

Updated: Mar 7, 2022

On 12 February 2022 People for Safe Vaccines released its analysis on the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in Australia.

The purpose of the report is to test the claims made by government and medical officials that mass vaccination reduces cases/infections, hospitalisations, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, deaths (CHIDs) and transmission in Australia by validating those claims against the real-world data.

The report examined the NSW situation closely using the available data sets in that state, as well as results from Australian Bureau of Statistics and Our World in Data.

This analysis revealed that the data don’t just show that the alleged vaccines fail to reduce risk of infection and transmission, but they also do not reduce CHIDs. In fact, they appear to be exacerbating them.

In our first supplementary report we provide updated figures and examine the recent provisional reports from the Australian Bureau of Statistics on All-cause mortality

and COVID-19 mortality, which states only 83 people died with COVID-19 rather than directly from the virus itself.

In addition we provide a commentary on the current outbreak of COVID-19 in Western Australia. Our observations indicate that lockdowns and mass vaccination fail to prevent or even control the spread of COVID-19 in the community.

"the recent increase in cases during strict lockdowns coincides with increased uptake of the vaccine boosters, suggesting that the booster shots may be the biggest contributing factor."

Statistics from NSW provide a clear correlation between uptake in boosters and spikes in CHIDs, coinciding with a sharp decrease in those 'unvaccinated'.

The following chart shows a statistically significant decrease in severe COVID-19 in those 'unvaccinated'.

In stark contrast to claims by government and medical officials that the vaccines reduce transmission and severity of disease, the statistics in hospitalisations, ICU admissions and deaths with COVID-19 increased. More intriguing is a significant portion of severe cases were in vaccinated persons.

In the report conclusion it states that because of Western Australia’s strict border restrictions and high vaccination rates, this group can be considered a virtual control group. Considering their statistically significant spike in transmission, hospitalisations and their first death since May 2020, it is a compelling argument that the social measures and mass vaccination is a distinct failure.

While the Secretary of Health, Dr Brendan Murphy continues to ignore our requests to review the vaccine rollout in children based on grounds that safety and efficacy are unacceptable for paediatric use, more and more Australians are experiencing and/or seeing these failings with their own eyes.

Unlike our politicians and medical officers, the figures don't lie and seeing them only confirms what many already suspect.

4,624 views9 comments

Recent Posts

See All


I agree with the concerns but did you did you do a statistical adjustment of people already vaxed against unvaxed eg 90% are vaxed and therefore percentage is hospital would be more .

SO if the proportion is 50/50 vax/unvax along with comparable sample subjects, then what would the percentage be of unvaxed in hospital.

Replying to

We must ask ourselves, what are the ‘clear clinical symptoms of the disease’? There are no new clinical symptoms.


If vaccines aren't mandated as ScoMo tells us, why does ATAGI regulate exemptions? Rhetorical question.

Replying to

Oh he's mandated them alright. He just prefers to hide that fact.


You only need to listen to the Israel summary from 2:04:00 in until around 3:20:00. The last session of Reiner's Grand Jury - section 6 (final).

This lady is the 2nd half of the testimony. This is her website.


Thanks Sandy. The percentages show definite changes. What do the graphs look like when you plot absolute numbers? The problem when using percentages is when the fraction for jabbed subjects go up, the fraction of unjabbed must go down, as they must add up to 100%. Absolute numbers would give a more accurate and complete picture. Have total CHIDs changed? What about CHIDs normalised to say per 100,000 people in the population?


Sandy Barrett
Sandy Barrett
Mar 02, 2022
Replying to

Elaine, your observations are valid however, the 7-day rolling average CHIDs per million correlate to testing and when the testing decreases so do CHIDs.

This is not the only variable that can impact numbers either. Currently tests use a cycle threshold cut-off of 40, but most commonly 45. This is above the Public Health Laboratory Network's recommendation and also Fauci's admission that cycle thresholds should be below 35 to reduce the risk of false positives. Given there are no statistics on the cycle thresholds used for each test, we cannot know if and when they change and most certainly if they are reduced, based on the evidence we can deduce that CHIDs will reduce with along with them. So the…

bottom of page