top of page
Search

The WHO Declares all PCR Tests at High CT to be Potentially 100% False Positive



In December 2020 the WHO declared that any result from a RT-PCR test that was amplified at a high cycle threshold (CT) e.g. above 35 CT is potentially 100% false positive. This leads us to question all the reported ‘cases’ of COVID19 disease in Australia in 2020. This is because Australia has reported that it was using this PCR test at a CT of 40-45 and most of the reported ‘cases’ were people without symptoms.


The question now is ‘What cycle threshold is the Australian government using in 2021?’ Has it been reduced at the same time as the vaccine was introduced to give the appearance that the vaccine has caused a decline in the cases of this disease?


The WHO says that in 2021 a manual readjustment of the PCR positivity threshold must be done to account for background noise in specimens with high cycle thresholds.


There is no transparency in the use of this test that is now allowing government’s globally to claim that healthy people without disease symptoms are an asymptomatic case of disease. This also enables the government to claim that healthy people are a risk to society. This is criminal and this is being based on a PCR test that is not a diagnostic tool for any disease.


Many doctors and scientists are stating this and they are being ignored and censored. Here is the inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, also stating ‘it is not a diagnostic test‘. It should never be used when symptoms are not also present.


In addition, it is these ‘cases’ that have been used by the government to enact the emergency powers. Yet the definition of a pandemic that is based on an increase in ‘cases’ of a disease has not been validated by the scientific community. It is not a scientific definition if it has not been validated by the community of scientists – only by elite individuals.


The case-tracing of healthy people with QR codes is fraudulent and it is enabling more ‘cases’ of disease to be obtained and more healthy people to be locked up and falsely declared a ‘case’ of disease. This is industry-pseudoscience, and it has all come about because the WHO allowed a small group of individuals, with financial conflicts of interest with industry, to adopt an unscientific definition of a ‘global pandemic’.


This makes the use of the emergency powers invalid and all the directives that have been enacted to control this non-pandemic of a flu-like illness. Please read the full article describing the unscientific definition of a pandemic that has been used by governments and also watch the interview with Elizabeth Hart on Asia Pacific Today. This interview describes the full extent of the Australian government’s conflicts of interest in promoting an untested drug in the population. She also describes the complicity of the mainstream media and research institutions in this fabricated and well planned ‘pandemic’ event.


This crime against the population has also been perpetuated by governments deliberately suppressing the treatments for respiratory viruses that are known to be beneficial. Here is Craig Kelly presenting his evidence of this suppression to an empty Australian parliament. This picture illustrates the type of ‘democracy’ that we have in Australia today. The people’s voice is not being heard by our government.


Here is the video of Dr. David Martin explaining to the International Criminal Court that there was nothing novel about the 2019 coronavirus. This is because it had been patented between 2008 – 2017 under gain of function research carried out in the US and in Wuhan, China. In addition, the fact that it was a mutated coronavirus means that humans would be expected to have some previous immunity to this virus because these are a family of common respiratory viruses that cause the common cold.


It is now clear that this is a ‘pandemic’ in name only. There is no evidence of enormous numbers of deaths (as indicated by global death rates at the end of 2020) and illness in the community, in all countries, and this is necessary under the scientific definition of a global pandemic. The WHO could not have declared this to be a ‘global pandemic’ in 2020, if the definition of a pandemic had not been changed in 2009.


The ‘cases’ of disease that the media is presenting are healthy people who have had a PCR test but have no symptoms. It is these cases in healthy people that are being used to close borders and quarantine healthy people in Australia.


This is a media campaign, not a pandemic, using statistics out of context to encourage the community to accept the governments new regulations that restrict our fundamental rights and freedoms, ultimately harming our health and wellbeing.

6,719 views19 comments

Recent Posts

See All

19 Comments


Our entire country is being locked up and made into a prison on the basis of false positives.

Like

I keep seeing people quoting the WHO as saying that CT>35 yields false positives, but when I actually read their bulletin I can't find the number 35 anywhere. (They use qualitative language - "high" and "low." ) I know there are studies that demonstrate the 35 number, and I know Dr Fauci has even stated that anything above 35 is just finding "dead nucleotides" so I'm not disputing the assertion that CT>35 can potentially give 100% false positives. (There are studies suggesting even CT>25 gives fairly meaningless results.) I just think we need to be really careful in misquoting things, and also to link to the actual source, when available, rather than a someone else's (in this case Off Guardian's) report.…

Like
Replying to

Thanks, Judy. Yes I very much appreciated the careful and skilful way you were able to quote the WHO and still the present correct information despite their vagueness, without leaving yourself open to accusation of misquoting.

Like

Do we have FOI replies as to the number of cycles on PCR in various states?

Like
Replying to


Like

This is very important referencing of the relevance of the PCR test. As I type this 18/7 11 million+ Australians are in Lockdown and Isolation all based on the 'cases' created by the initial and ongoing PCR test. The key question is that all Governments (State and Federal and their Health authorities) must provide is what CT rate they are running the current PCR test now in Australia today that has led to the current Lockdowns etc .If ,as I feel, the PCR is being run over 25CT then 90% of 'cases 'are false positive's and they are being used to fuel the 'Delta variant fear' -so we need transparency at the highest level .One final point re PCR …

Like
Replying to

Peter I feel as though the whole raft of damaging public policy response to this virus hangs on two faulty premises: 1. PCR test results 2. the assumption that asymptomatic transmission is significant

Like

When I tell people about this they reply by saying the test results are then subjected to genomic testing and traced back to the original 'case'. So if they are able to detect which strain it is then can it still be a false positive? Somebody explain it to me please!

Like
Replying to

PCR tests are not identifying different strains of coronavirus with the methods most countries are using. The current testing is generic only to the family of coronaviruses that make up 7-15% of respiratory viruses that we are exposed to. The PCR test is being used at CT's that are too high to distinguish between dead matter and viruses. A genomic sequence does not have to come from a natural virus. It can be a genetically engineered recombinant virus, computer-generated, so further genomic testing does not mean anything if you haven't proved isolation of the original virus. The underlying problem is also the fact that even if they were accurately identifying strains of coronavirus with this PCR test (which they aren't…

Like
bottom of page