The covid-19 pandemic and our response to it, has often seemed like a plot to a thriller, with twists and turns at every stage where:
The healthy are treated as suspects, and forced into isolation, masking and now experimental vaccination,
Questionable tests are employed as the gold-standard for diagnosis.
Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal immunity from liability.
Listing deaths of already frail and sick people who die with covid, as though they died because of covid, falsifies the true number of deaths.
Doubts about the true identity of the virus itself.
Questions arise about whether the virus was man-made.
Immunity is granted to medical doctors administering the vaccines, and now,
Military forces are helping to conduct the vaccine roll-out.
Surely such a plot could only be conjured up in the minds of the greatest authors of fantasy like J. R. R. Tolkien and George R.R Martin; or perhaps a well-organised coalition of shady global elites seeking to dominate the world.
But could it be that the biggest twist is a virus made in a laboratory, was done with the intention of using the 'cure' as the real bioweapon against humanity?
Let's take a look under the lens, following the data to see where it takes us.
First, we have Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Ralph Baric, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who has been involved in synthetic virus building, and is considered one of the world's leading coronavirus experts.
Then, Professor Shi Zhengli, a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin, and directs the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In 2015 the pair teamed up, and together they constructed a hybrid virus. Using the SARS virus taken from bats and rats, a group of Chinese researchers inserted a protein taken from bats into the SARS virus and a new super virus transmissible to humans was created.
This new chimera virus is as American as apple pie, and funded by the US Department of Health. What it demonstrated was that the spike protein was able to infect human cells. Professor Baric says the important thing to take from this is "there are viruses that exist in bat species, pre-programmed to jump between species or replicate just fine in humans.”
Chinese research into bat coronaviruses resulted in a large number of these SARS-like viruses sequenced into a database, and since China did not provide access to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, these computer sequences were used to synthesise it. In layman's terms that means, in the absence of the real virus, a computer model of it was created.
In 2017 the Wuhan team published the sequences of 11 new SARS-type coronaviruses identified in South China, Yunnan province. In another project co-financed by the American government, researchers constructed 8 different chimeras; two of them able to infect human cells.
In reference to "chimera" we are not speaking of the monstrous mythological fire-breathing hybrid creature, composed of the parts of more than one animal, but a single organism that's made up of cells from two or more "individuals"—that is, it contains two sets of DNA, with the code to make two separate organisms.
These two teams, working together, developed techniques for combining two different parts of different viruses into one virus; the backbone of one and the spike protein from another.
Matt Ridley, a Scientific journalist who has been investigating this story says "These experiments were being done to understand how virulent, how dangerous coronaviruses were, particularly SARS-like coronaviruses. In order to be able to be ready to combat a pandemic, they warned the world in a publication in 2015, jointly between Professor Baric’s team and Shi Zhengli’s team, that they were capable of making more dangerous pathogens and that this was a risky line of research.” So, they proclaimed they knew the dangers, in plain site.
Professor Baric goes on to say that "any vaccine or antibody that you made against the original virus from 2003, wasn’t going to protect the public against this new virus if it should emerge in the future. “ This is being evidenced now, as some of the most vaccinated populations are seeing huge spikes in covid-19 cases, called 'breakthrough cases'.
From the outset there have been questions about whether SARS-CoV-2 was made in a laboratory. While Professor Baric admits you can leave a signature showing that the mutation was built from material in, say the Baric laboratory, it can also be done without leaving a signature, thereby allowing you to artificially construct a virus indistinguishable from a natural one.
When asked whether SARS-CoV-2 was a chimeric virus made in a lab, Baric says he can't rule that out. Disturbingly, web archives show that Professor Shi made a vast public database of over 20,000 samples of bat and rodent coronaviruses, reporting very detailed information; that data has been inaccessible since September 12, 2019.
The fact that this vital information been removed raised concerns from many corners of the globe. If China has nothing to hide, then their transparency should not be a problem, right?
In the past, viruses recombining has never been a problem, so the obvious question is whether SARS-CoV-2 was a random coincidence, or a result of these studies?
In the aftermath of the covid-19 outbreak, a race to make vaccines occurred and the entire population is being asked to participate in the largest medical experiment in our history, by getting vaccinated with new and untested technology.
While these pharmaceutical companies are turning their executives into new billionaires, the spike protein used in vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer is being proclaimed a danger to our health. A ticking timebomb unleashed, apparently unwittingly.
Dr. Robert Malone, creator of mRNA vaccine technology, said "the COVID vaccine lipid nanoparticles — which tell the body to produce the spike protein — leave the injection site and accumulate in organs and tissues." Other experts across the world like Dr Peter A. McCullough and Dr. Harvey Risch believe that doctors are unwittingly causing their patients harm.
It was 'assumed' that the mRNA COVID vaccines would behave like traditional vaccines and that the spike protein, responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms, would remain mostly in the injection site at the shoulder muscle or lymph nodes.
Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph, Ontario says “We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now,” “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people, we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”
This spike protein, produced through mRNA and other gene technologies, alters our cells mimicking the spike protein of the virus, causing the body to attack itself when it encounters the wild virus. This is what is referred to as "pathogenic priming" and in effect has weaponised these vaccines.
As of June 19, 2021, there have been 15,472 deaths and 1,509,266 injuries of which 753,657 are serious injuries in the 27 European countries under the EU. In the US 6,113 deaths and 31,240 serious injuries have been reported between Dec. 14, 2020 and June 18, 2021. In four short months, Australia has reported 335 deaths and 33,807 injuries. What is more disconcerting is that we know for certain that adverse effects are considerably under-reported.
The not-for-profit organisation People for Safe Vaccines issued a letter to the federal Minister for Foreign Affairs, Marise Payne, requesting an investigation into the origins of the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and an immediate suspension on covid-19 vaccine roll-out, pending the outcome. The letter outlines recent disturbing reports that the Wuhan Laboratory, known for first detecting the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has been involved in the creation of biological weapons. It also cites a scientific paper by international virologists Sorenson, Dalgleish and Susrud and testimony from Chinese ex-Wuhan lab scientist turned whistleblower Li-Meng Yan, that the virus is of unnatural origin.
On 24th June, 2021 Health Minister Greg Hunt ordered a review into gain-of-function research in Australia, when it was revealed the CSIRO and Australian universities have participated in at least ten joint projects over the last decade with the Wuhan Institute of virology, which has been linked to the Chinese Military, and which is suspected of being at the centre of the COVID-19 outbreak. For those who don't know, gain of function research is biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses.
Yet despite this, 2 days later, Scott Morrison announced intentions to mandate what may be considered weaponised vaccines; even in spite of the fact that mandates were NOT recommended by the committee which the government allegedly relies upon to navigate the pandemic response.
In response to this move, People for Safe Vaccines has issued an open letter to the Minister for Foreign Affairs asking the government to appoint an analyst to investigate the vaccines as potential bioweapons, and to immediately suspend the roll-out, including all or any mandates. You can read the letter below.
Australia is a signatory to the U.N. Biological Weapons Convention 1972, which is adopted here in the Crimes (Biological Weapons) Act 1976 and prohibits the acquisition, stockpiling and retention of microbial agents that have no justification for peaceful purposes; and also prohibits any delivery means designed to use those agents for hostile purposes. Section 12 of the Act allows the Minister to appoint an analyst to examine and report on the substance. The Attorney-General can then decide whether to prosecute.
We are urging the Government to investigate the vaccine as a suspected bioweapon – including the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, as well as the genetic technologies used in reproducing this spike protein in the body.
With a new and strong coalition of experts forming across the world, who seek to challenge the mainstream narrative using science-based facts, the plot will continue for now; but rest-assured, People for Safe Vaccines will continue to have a hand in writing a new ending to this thriller, one that arrives at the truth through proper science and transparency, where the only thing being forced is a thorough inquiry into the facts for the benefit and safety of all Australians.
You can read our first letter to the Department of Foreign Affairs here.
And our second letter here.