top of page
Search

Chronology of Communications

As members of People for Safe Vaccines, you provide the means for our legal team to communicate our collective concerns to our government, with the covid-19 "vaccine" roll-out. Thank you for supporting this movement.



From the beginning we have always maintained that the "vaccines" should never be mandatory. And in spite of the initial suggestion from Scott Morrison that they will make it as "mandatory as possible", with our pressure; they have changed their position.


However, we know how the government operates and we are persistently lobbying them about the important issues, which we will continue to do.


For your benefit, we have added a new page to the site for members only. https://www.peopleforsafevaccines.org/chronology This page will give you a full chronology of communications, so you can keep abreast of the demands we have presented, and the responses we are receiving.


Like the inner workings of a time-piece, government lobbying and legal strategising is a complex process, and getting all the pieces to work together in perfect harmony is an art and a science. We are putting all the pieces in place that we hope will not only address your immediate concerns with the covid-19 "vaccine" roll-out, but equally require individual choice, either way - refuse or accept - in place of medical tyranny.


This week we sent a letter to the respective Safework and/or Worksafe Regulators in each State and Territory, outlining concerns with employers trying to mandate COVID-19 vaccination, and seeking government to commit to publishing guidance that clarifies that employers do not have power to force vaccination.


Watch this important video message from CEO Serene Teffaha.


We will have more news for you soon as we continue this important lobbying effort to ensure proper, informed consent is always ensured, and all business owners know where they stand with their customers and employees: can they force or coerce an employee with threats of dismissal if they refuse; and can any incentives provided to employers by pharmaceutical manufacturers and governments to be their hanchmen be legally contested in the future.

207 views12 comments

Recent Posts

See All

12件のコメント


Thank you Serene, very interesting point you raised regarding Insurance, I'm wondering how this will also effect private health insurance claims in the future whether your vaccinated or not ?

いいね!

Is anyone familiar with this form – and whether it's a good idea to submit it?:

Australian Immunisation Register (AIR) - ceasing correspondence and release of information form (IM017)

Use this form to advise the Australian Immunisation Register you don't want to receive correspondence, or share information with third parties.

https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/organisations/health-professionals/forms/im017

It was posted in a group with these comments:

  • Your vaccine info to become unprivatised

  • You can download this form👇🏻 and send it off to protect your immunisation info

  • Make sure you ring afterwards to confirm this has been done or get a confirmation email.

Then there's the BLOCK LETTERS requirement question again...

Any comments from the legal perspective on:

1. Whether it's a good idea to fill out…

いいね!

This link may be slow to load or may have been taken down since yesterday. This is the WHO's official reactions website. Type in Comirnaty. http://www.vigiaccess.org/

いいね!

Oh forgot to mention on the packaging of the Pfizer one it says testing is to be completed in 2023. So they are testing it on us! We are the guinea pigs!


It's completely outrageous given there are safe treatments for COVID19 that have no risk of death or serious injury!


Over 1000 deaths from these experimental vaccines already officially reported in the US and the CDC studies show only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported so you can multiply this by 100!

https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-19&DIED=Yes

いいね!

This is great info!


We should not however be calling these "vaccines" since they are not tested properly and have only been given emergency use so they are experimental vaccines at best.


But the Pfizer one is not even called a vaccine on their web site but an operating system since it permanently alters our DNA so is not under any definition a "vaccine"!

いいね!
返信先

The Australian government is referring to them as vaccines, so this is why we use the word in quotes and on the website we refer to them as experimental.

いいね!
bottom of page